If the pirates were not pirates but the Han Chinese who didn't yield to their "dear fellow" bullies, would they get paid ransom or get shot dead?
Why did the Han Chinese pay the pirates for being attacked? They are the people who would roar at their "dear-from-the-same-womb's" that whatever they say is "true", and they can kill their fellow Han Chinese like killing chicken.
It is because there's no any right in their minds. They don't have others' rights in their minds to restrict themselves, nor have their own rights in their minds to defend, but have "who can bully and who should surrender" full of their minds. And now they got bullied and they thought they should surrender, and they just did.
The evil and sick people!
donderdag 31 december 2009
maandag 28 december 2009
Attacking by supposing themselves to be either inferior or superior
The Han Chinese have two kinds of moral values for them to attack others or defend themselves. The two kinds of moral values are opposite to each other. But they can peacefully exist in the same people's mind because they are not their behavior conducts, nor the rules for themselves, nor the moral duties they should attend to. The two moral systems are unique to the Han Chinese people because of their unbalanced political relationships and their unbalanced psychological states.
The Han Chinese moral codes have nothing to do with fairness. All moral duties are the reasons for themselves to be right/correct and for others to accept them. That's why you can see it so ridiculous when the Han Chinese try to attack other by citing both their moral codes that are contradictory to each other. And when they suppose the attacked people to be inferior, they just consider themselves to be the superior, and they are arrogant rude, they look down upon others. But when they try to attack others by supposing others to be the superior, they use the moral codes for the superior to restrict them, to demand them, and to free themselves from any duty. They would beg or demand you. But, their goal is the same. They try to seek reasons to force you to accept them, not act against them. Actually, by supposing themselves either to be inferior or superior to you, they behave like having power to rule you by citing your duties and their rights unilaterally. Just like their unbalanced psychological state, they can never be balanced when they are in the conflict with others. They can't consider each other fairly. And the two states can swift in minutes. They can be arrogant rude for a while, and can beg for a while.
Are the Han Chinese too smart, as smart as how they consider themselves to be? Or just too sick?
The Han Chinese moral codes have nothing to do with fairness. All moral duties are the reasons for themselves to be right/correct and for others to accept them. That's why you can see it so ridiculous when the Han Chinese try to attack other by citing both their moral codes that are contradictory to each other. And when they suppose the attacked people to be inferior, they just consider themselves to be the superior, and they are arrogant rude, they look down upon others. But when they try to attack others by supposing others to be the superior, they use the moral codes for the superior to restrict them, to demand them, and to free themselves from any duty. They would beg or demand you. But, their goal is the same. They try to seek reasons to force you to accept them, not act against them. Actually, by supposing themselves either to be inferior or superior to you, they behave like having power to rule you by citing your duties and their rights unilaterally. Just like their unbalanced psychological state, they can never be balanced when they are in the conflict with others. They can't consider each other fairly. And the two states can swift in minutes. They can be arrogant rude for a while, and can beg for a while.
Are the Han Chinese too smart, as smart as how they consider themselves to be? Or just too sick?
The reasons for the Han Chinese attack
For the Han Chinese, attack has nothing to do with fairness, but with "if I should be afraid of you or not". If they are not afraid of you, they don't think you can attack them. But if they are afraid of you, they think you can attack or punish them even if they did nothing wrong. And it is all the necessary reason for you to do so.
Punishment because of the behaviors in the past or in the future?
Punishment because of the behaviors in the past or in the future?
You would think this question is ridiculous. But it is serious for the Han Chinese.
When the Han Chinese want to punish you, they would tell you it is because you did something wrong in the past, and also because you would do something wrong in the future (they punish you to prevent you from doing anything wrong).
But, if you want to punish the Han Chinese because what they did in the past, they would viciously shout at you, "Why can't you forget anything happened in the past?!" "Why do you remember something happened in the past?!" They think you are wrong when you remember what they did in the past. What if you remember something they would do in the future? You would get slapped.
So, should we get punished because we did something wrong IN THE PAST or IN THE FUTURE?
Either for you.
Neither for the Han Chinese.
You would think this question is ridiculous. But it is serious for the Han Chinese.
When the Han Chinese want to punish you, they would tell you it is because you did something wrong in the past, and also because you would do something wrong in the future (they punish you to prevent you from doing anything wrong).
But, if you want to punish the Han Chinese because what they did in the past, they would viciously shout at you, "Why can't you forget anything happened in the past?!" "Why do you remember something happened in the past?!" They think you are wrong when you remember what they did in the past. What if you remember something they would do in the future? You would get slapped.
So, should we get punished because we did something wrong IN THE PAST or IN THE FUTURE?
Either for you.
Neither for the Han Chinese.
Good intention and ill intention
Good intention:
If you made minor mistakes, the Han Chinese would punish you, because you should be taught a lesson to remember what you did, and you would not make the same mistakes in the future. It is considered to be good for you. And those who punished you are good intentioned and you should appreciate them after getting punished by them.
Ill intention
If the Han Chinese made serious mistakes, you can't punish them. You can't even mention them. Otherwise, it is you, not them, who get attacked, because you are not tolerant, narrow-minded, bigot, virulent, hostile, unfriendly, and you can't forget what happened in the past. It means, if you punish them, your action must be because of your ill-intention.
If you made minor mistakes, the Han Chinese would punish you, because you should be taught a lesson to remember what you did, and you would not make the same mistakes in the future. It is considered to be good for you. And those who punished you are good intentioned and you should appreciate them after getting punished by them.
Ill intention
If the Han Chinese made serious mistakes, you can't punish them. You can't even mention them. Otherwise, it is you, not them, who get attacked, because you are not tolerant, narrow-minded, bigot, virulent, hostile, unfriendly, and you can't forget what happened in the past. It means, if you punish them, your action must be because of your ill-intention.
The superior group of cancer cells
Cancer cells are absolutely evil. Any normal cell should do something good to the body, the life, when it consumes nutrition or oxygen. But cancer cells don't. They consume nutrition and oxygen but do nothing good to the life they rely on. And in the end, they destroy the life to kill themselves.
The typical Han Chinese people are all like cancer cells. They behave like cancer cells and think like cancer cells. They try to prove good to be evil, and prove evil to be good, to destroy human values.
But, the Han Chinese ethnic group must be immune to any criticism because it is a people, it is a group, it is human, and it is because of their "shining culture". Even further, this group must be a superior group among all the ethnic groups in the world because only this can satisfy their unbalanced disorder. They are extremely arrogant and rude.
Isn't it too ridiculous?
The superior group of cancer cells!
The typical Han Chinese people are all like cancer cells. They behave like cancer cells and think like cancer cells. They try to prove good to be evil, and prove evil to be good, to destroy human values.
But, the Han Chinese ethnic group must be immune to any criticism because it is a people, it is a group, it is human, and it is because of their "shining culture". Even further, this group must be a superior group among all the ethnic groups in the world because only this can satisfy their unbalanced disorder. They are extremely arrogant and rude.
Isn't it too ridiculous?
The superior group of cancer cells!
Why is it necessary for the Han Chinese to bully and surrender?
You would absolutely disagree with those who bully and surrender.
But, if you are in any kind of relationship with the Han Chinese, and if you don't bully nor surrender but try to treat each other equally and fairly, you are just considered to be evil by the Han Chinese.
Why?
The psychological state that the Han Chinese are in compels them to seek the chances to release their stress to those who don't bully, and they just can't resist to those who bully, but surrender. They accept the pressure from the superior and try to release the stress to the inferior. It is "natural", unconscious, for the Han Chinese to behave that way. When you don't bully nor surrender, your behavior is just against their unbalanced disorder, and it makes them uncomfortable or angry. If you are considered to be their fellow Han Chinese, you would get attacked immediately by the arrogant rude Han Chinese because of your "abnormality". If you are not the Han Chinese, they just call you "devils/monsters/ghosts" (鬼佬). That means it is understandable for you, the non-human, not to bully nor surrender.
But, if you are in any kind of relationship with the Han Chinese, and if you don't bully nor surrender but try to treat each other equally and fairly, you are just considered to be evil by the Han Chinese.
Why?
The psychological state that the Han Chinese are in compels them to seek the chances to release their stress to those who don't bully, and they just can't resist to those who bully, but surrender. They accept the pressure from the superior and try to release the stress to the inferior. It is "natural", unconscious, for the Han Chinese to behave that way. When you don't bully nor surrender, your behavior is just against their unbalanced disorder, and it makes them uncomfortable or angry. If you are considered to be their fellow Han Chinese, you would get attacked immediately by the arrogant rude Han Chinese because of your "abnormality". If you are not the Han Chinese, they just call you "devils/monsters/ghosts" (鬼佬). That means it is understandable for you, the non-human, not to bully nor surrender.
zondag 27 december 2009
Dear-from-the-same-penis
"Dear-from-the-same-womb's" is how the Han Chinese say folks, countrymen, or fellows. That means the Han Chinese all came from the same womb. And they must be brothers, sisters.
And the mainland Han Chinese have been calling those Chinese, who don't live in China, "the lost sons" or "the wandering sons" or "the drifting sons", and trying to hunt them back to be under the control by the mainland Han Chinese.
But I can't understand how the mom and her sons could come from the same womb. All of her sons or daughters could. But how could the mom come from her own womb?????????????
I suppose the mom would be too excited to realize the reality when she thinks about her son-slaves.
If she calls her "lost sons" "dear-from-the-same-penis", it would be possible. And there are two reasons supporting it.
1. It is possible for the father and his daughter to have sex to breed. And when they have children, the mom can say that she and her children came from the same penis.
2. When Mongols conquered the Han Chinese, all Mongol men could have sex with any Han Chinese woman at any time at any place as they wanted. And it lasted about 90 years. It is long enough for the Han Chinese women to have sex with their Mongol masters to breed daughters and long enough for the daughters to grow old enough to have sex with their Mongol fathers to breed their own children. So, it is possible for the Han Chinese moms to call their children "dear-from-the-same-penis".
I suggest the mainland Han Chinese to call other Chinese "dear-from-the-same-penis" to correct their mistake.
And the mainland Han Chinese have been calling those Chinese, who don't live in China, "the lost sons" or "the wandering sons" or "the drifting sons", and trying to hunt them back to be under the control by the mainland Han Chinese.
But I can't understand how the mom and her sons could come from the same womb. All of her sons or daughters could. But how could the mom come from her own womb?????????????
I suppose the mom would be too excited to realize the reality when she thinks about her son-slaves.
If she calls her "lost sons" "dear-from-the-same-penis", it would be possible. And there are two reasons supporting it.
1. It is possible for the father and his daughter to have sex to breed. And when they have children, the mom can say that she and her children came from the same penis.
2. When Mongols conquered the Han Chinese, all Mongol men could have sex with any Han Chinese woman at any time at any place as they wanted. And it lasted about 90 years. It is long enough for the Han Chinese women to have sex with their Mongol masters to breed daughters and long enough for the daughters to grow old enough to have sex with their Mongol fathers to breed their own children. So, it is possible for the Han Chinese moms to call their children "dear-from-the-same-penis".
I suggest the mainland Han Chinese to call other Chinese "dear-from-the-same-penis" to correct their mistake.
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)
